There are other examples of mutual recognition of the rules, including the EU-US marine equipment regulation in 2004, the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Arrangement between Australia and New Zealand (TTMRA) in 1998 and the EU-Swiss MRA in 2002. This would make life much more difficult for British producers, who would be forced to have the products certified by the EU authorities before they could be exported to the continent. The European Commission`s approach to the United Kingdom differs from what it has negotiated with other countries. However, European Commission trade negotiators recently rejected mutual recognition of the compliance assessment by UK testing laboratories. During a transitional period, the authorities assess each other`s pharmaceutical legislation, guidelines and regulatory systems under the agreement. In the Brexit negotiations, the UK government called for mutual recognition of the rules, including in Theresa May`s florence speech and as an option for future regulation of financial services, but refused by the EU. Mutual recognition agreements set out the conditions under which a party (non-member state) accepts compliance assessment results (for example. B tests or certifications) conducted by the compliance assessment agencies (CABs) designated by the other party to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the first part (non-member) and vice versa. A traditional MRA is a mutual recognition agreement for “compliance assessment.” Mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) promote trade in goods between the European Union and third countries and facilitate market access. These are bilateral agreements designed to facilitate industry access to compliance assessment. Mutual recognition agreements/agreements (MRAs) for compliance assessment are agreements between governments to facilitate trade in telecommunications equipment. MRA establish procedures for contracting parties to recognize the appropriate compliance assessment bodies (CABs – such as test laboratories or certification bodies) and to accept the results of the compliance assessment of these CABs for regulatory purposes.
It is essential that “traditional” MRA does not require states to harmonize the rules (i.e. establishing technical standards and common rules) and do not require parties to one MRA to recognize each other`s requirements as equivalent – MRA is limited to the recognition of the partner`s CAB`s responsibility for assessing compliance.